🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty designed to protect females from violence, covering family violence, following prolonged and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final authority now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring governments to develop laws and assistance programs to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to initiate the procedure of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary parties advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked widespread protest both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has called a protest for the coming week, charging lawmakers of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a hasty decision driven by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds support, the president could possibly send back the bill for additional review if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but across Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Family violence rates have been rising in multiple European nations
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could affect similar discussions in other EU countries